|
Moral Basis of a Backward Society | 
 enlarge | Author: Edward C. Banfield
Publisher: Free Press
Category: Book
List Price: $18.95
Buy New: $10.20
You Save: $8.75 (46%)
New (19) Used (17) from $10.19
Rating:  8 reviews
Sales Rank: 228606
Media: Paperback
Edition: 1st
Pages: 188
Number Of Items: 1
Shipping Weight (lbs): 0.6
Dimensions (in): 8.5 x 5.1 x 0.5
ISBN: 0029015103
Dewey Decimal Number: 300
EAN: 9780029015100
Publication Date: February 1, 1967
Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
Shipping: Expedited shipping available
Condition: BRAND NEW-- NEVER READ soft cover book has been in a dry/smoke free home. Pages are tight, crisp, and clean -- you'll hear the book crack when you open it. Soft cover is in excellent condition -- no stray marks inside or out, -- sharp corners -- no bumps scratches, dents! - no blemishes. This is a pristine copy.-- pristine! GIFT QUALITY. NOT a remainder book with black marker slashes on page edges or EX library book with stickers or markings. I ship daily. Carefully packaged with bubble wrap for the journey and I provide email verification at time of shipment. Delivered in 3-6 days (Expedited) or 10-14 days (Standard). Expedited shipping recommended for speedy delivery. Customer service and satisfaction is a priority. Full disclosure on all books all the time! Buy with confidence from a customer-rated FIVE STAR Seller!!
| |
| Similar Items:
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 3 more reviews...
 A Young Man's Astonishment and Anger August 12, 2005
X (Palookaville)
15 out of 16 found this review helpful
Ed Banfield must have been about 42 when this book was published, yet it has a young man's astonishment and a young man's anger. Shrewd and observant as he was, he seems not to have realized what the world could be like until he settled down here in what was then (as, indeed, now) one of the poorest parts of Italy. It shocked him, as indeed it might have, for any number of reasons. But Banfield focused on just one: "the inability of the villagers to act together for their common good or, indeed, for any end transcending the immediate, material interest of the nuclear family." Until then, Banfield had been (he would surely hate this characterization) an American innocent-one thinks of the Ugly American in Graham Greene's novel, all good intentions and unintentional mischief. The difference is, of course, that Banfield did not remain an innocent: with his unflinching clarity of vision, and his shrewd capacity for synthesis, he used this inquiry to launch himself into one of the most important careers in political science in the 20th Century.
In hindsight, one may be tempted to say that he could have known better. He does quote from "Christ Stopped at Eboli," by Carlo Levi. But in addition to Levi, others had seen what Banfield came to see: one thinks of Verga or Silone (one is tempted to add Sciascia, but most of his work came later). Indeed, closer to home, he might have learnd from Norman Lewis' great "Naples '44."
But this, as I concede, is hindsight. The fact is that you can't think of any other American scholar of his generation in his time who approached this kind of problem in this kind of way.
Banfield's encounter with Montegrano clearly informs his later work: his studies of Richard Daley's Chicago and his later, more general work on city politics and on government in general. Superficially, this may appear paradoxical. In Montegrano, Banfield lamented the curse of "amoral familism." This might seem to suggest a distrust of families, and a hospitality to government participation ("It takes a village..."). Yet Daley's Chicago is a community of families and his later work shows a distrust of government that borders on truculence.
The paradox is, of course, quite superficial. Daley's Chicago is a community of families, but a community with a vibrant public life. And it is the very corruption of government in a place like Montegrano that adds such plausibility to Banfield's later critique. One thinks of James C. Scott and his admirable "Seeing Like a State".
There is another and wholly different virtue of Banfield's work that deserves mention. This is his use of scholarly apparatus. The blurb on my old Basic Books copy says mentions (appreciatively) his "use of T.A.T. materials" along with "intensive standardized fieldwork Neo-Freudian psychology, and structural-functional analysis." Even the concept of "amoral familism" bears the smell of the lamp. It is all bound to send the alert reader fleeing to the new Harry Potter. A critical mistake: Banfield not only survives all the academic detritus, he positively transcends it: he is one of the few who can make this kind of analytical structure produce something plausible and interesting.
Footnote: for further background on Banfield, there is a wonderful appreciation by his sometimes co-author, James Q. Wilson, in The Public Interest for Winter 2003. Google "Banfield Wilson Public Interest moral basis" and it ought to be the first hit.
Career defining work November 4, 2006
Dr. Ronald Fountain (Shaker Heights, OH United States)
1 out of 1 found this review helpful
Edward Banfield's reputation was built on the basis of this book and the research that informed it. While I am confident that he added significant value in his work and writing subsequent to this effort, I am equally confident that in the minds of most of Banfield's fans, at least those with whom I have discussed this book, he was defined by this work. The Moral Basis of a Backward Society is an exceptionally powerful ethnography describing what happens when there is no "community" even in what is described and thought of as a community, as in the village that serves as the backdrop for this book. Outstanding lessons are observable in this work that are transferable to our current society. When we decide we will work together, there are few limits to what we can accomplish. When we fail to do that, all of us, and the community spirit suffers.
Excellent study on an age old question December 12, 2000
14 out of 16 found this review helpful
This book is very relevant to the question of the effect of culture on development. I have lived half my life in an Anglo culture, and the other half in a Latin culture- very similar to that of Southern Italy. I can absolutely assert that the findings in this book are a true description of 'amoral familism' and the effects on a society. As for a previous reviewer, I suggest he actually live in Southern Italy (or a similar culture) before he omits an opinion that is based on a limited, provincial experience of only living in the US (or a anglo culture). Anyone who has experienced -truly experienced- an anglo and a latin culture will agree with the conclusions drawn by the author.
 The book was a study on a poor village in Southern Italy January 20, 1999
19 out of 22 found this review helpful
Antecedents to this study lie in two areas: the study of social capital and the study of giving to and volunteering for charity. A large body of work now exists on the theme of social capital. Alexis de Tocqueville is cited as remarking on the civic associations of America in the 1800s. More recently the concept of social capital, if not the exact words, were reported by Edward Banfield in The Moral Basis of a Backward Society (Banfield, 1958). Banfield's book was a study on a poor village in Southern Italy and explored the reasons for the low level of development there. Banfield surmised that the fundamental reason for the village's low level of development was the incapacity of local residents to work together. The term social capital was first used in the 1980s by Pierre Bourdieu and James Coleman, though Coleman received credit for establishing the analytical framework of social capital in his exploration of education (Bourdieu, 1986 and Coleman, 1988). Coleman's work has served as a theoretical framework for studies in education and social capital through to the present.
A new field of study October 17, 2003
2 out of 4 found this review helpful
For those of us that wish to look at the foundations of the case study, Banfield's book is a good start. The only problem is his definition of what constitutes a backwards scoiety. His work was new and intruiging, but it explains the human nature without addressing human nature. By nature, humans are selfish. In the case of an isolated village, the people of Montegrano were not backwards. Instead they were doing what was necessary to survive. They did not organize for the greater good of society because they were too busy searching for food for that day and the next. That does not seem backwards. That seems like survival of the fittest,to use a tired cliche. Whenever examining a case study, we need to be sure that we do not generalize the subject.
|
|
|
| |
